Risk Management

Monitoring and Review: Maintaining Compliance Effectiveness

Learn to build robust monitoring systems that track compliance status, measure control effectiveness, and drive continuous improvement. Transform compliance from periodic assessment to real-time visibility.

Understanding Compliance Monitoring

Monitoring and review is the ongoing process of tracking compliance status, evaluating control effectiveness, and identifying emerging risks. It closes the loop in the risk management cycle, ensuring that risk responses remain effective and the organization maintains compliance over time.

Without effective monitoring, organizations operate blind to their actual compliance status. Controls may degrade, new risks emerge undetected, and violations occur without timely correction. Monitoring transforms compliance from periodic snapshots to continuous awareness.

From Periodic to Continuous

Traditional compliance relied on annual audits and periodic assessments. Modern compliance monitoring provides real-time visibility through automated testing, continuous data analysis, and proactive alerting. This shift enables faster response and more effective risk management.

Monitoring Approaches

Effective monitoring programs combine multiple approaches to provide comprehensive coverage.

Continuous Monitoring

Automated, real-time tracking of compliance indicators using technology to analyze transactions, test controls, and alert on exceptions as they occur.

Periodic Assessments

Scheduled reviews that evaluate compliance status at defined intervals—monthly, quarterly, or annually depending on risk level and requirements.

Compliance Audits

Formal examinations of compliance programs by internal audit or external parties. Provide independent assurance and identify systemic issues.

Self-Assessments

Business unit evaluations of their own compliance using structured questionnaires and checklists. Build ownership while identifying issues.

Key Risk Indicators (KRIs)

KRIs are metrics that provide early warning of increasing risk exposure. Well-designed KRIs enable proactive intervention before risks materialize.

Leading Indicators

Predict future compliance issues

Lagging Indicators

Confirm risk materialization

Thresholds

Trigger actions when crossed

Effective KRI Design

  • Relevant: Directly linked to significant compliance risks
  • Measurable: Based on available, reliable data
  • Timely: Updated frequently enough to enable action
  • Actionable: Clear thresholds that trigger defined responses
  • Comparable: Enable trend analysis over time

Control Monitoring

Controls must be tested regularly to verify they continue operating effectively. Control monitoring validates that risk responses remain adequate.

Control Testing Methods

  • Automated Testing: Technology-based testing that runs continuously or on schedule
  • Sample Testing: Review of selected transactions or activities for compliance
  • Observation: Direct observation of control execution
  • Inquiry: Interviews with control operators to verify understanding and execution
  • Re-performance: Independent execution of controls to verify results

Testing Frequency

Base testing frequency on control importance and risk level. Critical controls addressing high risks should be tested more frequently than routine controls for lower risks. Adjust frequency based on control performance history.

Review Processes

Periodic reviews assess overall compliance program effectiveness and identify areas for improvement.

1

Gather Data

Compile monitoring results, audit findings, incident data, and KRI trends for the review period.

2

Analyze Findings

Identify patterns, root causes, and systemic issues. Compare performance against objectives and benchmarks.

3

Assess Effectiveness

Evaluate whether the compliance program is achieving its objectives. Identify strengths and weaknesses.

4

Recommend Improvements

Develop specific recommendations for addressing identified issues and enhancing program effectiveness.

5

Report & Act

Communicate findings to stakeholders and implement approved improvements.

Compliance Reporting

Effective reporting communicates compliance status to stakeholders and drives accountability. Tailor reports to audience needs.

  • Executive Dashboards: High-level status, trends, and key issues for leadership
  • Board Reports: Strategic view of compliance posture and significant risks
  • Operational Reports: Detailed metrics and issues for compliance managers
  • Regulatory Reports: Required disclosures and certifications
  • Exception Reports: Issues requiring immediate attention

Continuous Improvement

Monitoring and review should drive ongoing enhancement of the compliance program. Use findings to identify improvement opportunities, implement changes, and verify effectiveness. This creates a virtuous cycle of ever-improving compliance capability.